A legitimate corruption announcement triggers dismissal protection for the public employee which is effective retroactively from the moment of making the announcement. Whistleblower which made a legitimate corruption announcement cannot be dismissed until the investigation which he/she instigated is terminated.
If the ombudsman found the corruption announcement to be justified and on that basis the whistleblower would be granted protection against dismissal until the moment when the announced corruption prosecution would have been terminated, it would be possible to effectively protect position of whistleblowers so that corruption perpetrators could not achieve their recall.
Sources:
- Transparency International: Curbing Corruption in Public Procurement, A Practical Guide, 2014, p. 17
- Transparency International Czech Republic: Whistleblowing is not snitching, A Guide not only for whistleblowers, September 2014, p. 57
- Public Money and Corruption Risks – A Comparative Analysis, Frank Bold, 2013, p. 77
- REST. Depolitisation of the civil service, Reconstruction of the State [online], 2013, principle 4
- Transparency International: International Principles for Whistleblower Legislation – Best Practices for Laws to Protect Whistleblowers and Support Whistleblowing in the Public Interest, 2013, p. 6
- Oživení: Whistleblower protection, Analysis developed for the purpose of preparation of new legal regulation in Czech Republic, 2011, p. 33 - 37, 60 – 64
- Transparency International: Alternative to silence – Whistleblower protection in 10 European Countries: Whistleblowers protection in the Czech Republic – Key Findings, 2009, p. 27
- Transparency International Czech Republic: Whistleblowing and the protection of whistleblowers in the Czech Republic, November 2009, p. 15 – 17
- Vondráček, O., Havrda, M., 21 recipes – Anti-corruption cookbook, Recipe 12: Corruption whistleblowing, December 2013
More about methodology
Justification and sources