Public Defender of Rights (Ombudsman) should assess the legitimacy of whistleblower’s announcement. Should he/she find that there are facts in the announcement that indicate that the unlawful behavior of public administration or corruption occurred, the Public Defender of Rights (Ombudsman) should consider the announcement to be legitimate.
If the assessment of corruption announcements were performed by the ombudsman, it would be possible to that the substance of those announcements could be subject to an expert legal assessment and separate justified announcements from the unjustified ones.
Sources:
- Transparency International: Curbing Corruption in Public Procurement, A Practical Guide, 2014, p. 17
- Transparency International Czech Republic: Whistleblowing is not snitching, A Guide not only for whistleblowers, September 2014, p. 57
- Public Money and Corruption Risks – A Comparative Analysis, Frank Bold, 2013, p. 77
- REST. Depolitisation of the civil service, Reconstruction of the State [online], 2013, principle 4
- Transparency International: International Principles for Whistleblower Legislation – Best Practices for Laws to Protect Whistleblowers and Support Whistleblowing in the Public Interest, 2013, p. 5 - 6
- Transparency International: Corruption risks in the Visegrad Countries – Visegrad Integrity System Study, 2012, p. 7 – 8
- Oživení: Whistleblower protection, Analysis developed for the purpose of preparation of new legal regulation in Czech Republic, 2011, p. 33 - 37, 60 – 64
- Transparency International Czech Republic: Whistleblowing and the protection of whistleblowers in the Czech Republic, November 2009, p. 15 – 17
- Vondráček, O., Havrda, M., 21 recipes – Anti-corruption cookbook, Recipe 12: Corruption whistleblowing, December 2013
More about methodology
Justification and sources