The results and analyses of expert assignments to individual tenders performed by the certified software should be published to ensure control by the public of software functioning.
If the results of analysis of attribution of experts to the evaluation of concrete public procurement bids were made public, and hence made subject to public oversight, it would not be possible that the analytical software itself was corrupt as was the case with respect to software ensuring bid selection by drawing of lots.
Sources:
- Transparency International: Curbing Corruption in Public Procurement, A Practical Guide, 2014, p. 16
- Kameník, M., Plhoň, T., Šanc, F.,More than a Public Procurement Act: economy, transparency and accountability in public purchases, Oživení, 2012, p. 51
- Vondráček, O., Havrda, M., 21 recipes – Anti-corruption cookbook, Recipe 18: Fair assessment of public procurement bids, December 2013
More about methodology
Justification and sources