Itemized budget should be a part of tender documentation for standardized contracts, in particular for construction contracts. The expected quality of each given item shall be defined by the state, for example, which quality should the surface material of the highway possess. Providing that an itemized budget is well defined, the price should be the main criteria for the assessment of submitted offers. Public contracts should not be artificially divided into smaller ones.
If for public works which can be standardised, in particular for building contracts, there was an itemised budget which would be a part of tendering specifications, including the definition of quality requirements in respect of each item, and if contracts were not divided into smaller ones, it would be possible to tender public contracts on the basis of the best overall price (i.e. overall lifetime costs) which would in number of cases prevent subsequent legal disputes.
Sources:
- Frank Bold: Governance, transparency and public participation in transport infrastructure Projects, 2014, p. 28 and 35
- Kameník, M.et al., Openness of tender procedures in the Czech Republic, Oživení, 2011
- What do data say about behaviour of grantors? CERGE-EI, ppt , 31 August 2011, p. 2 - 4
- Kohout, P. andcoll., Collection of texts of a working group for the fight against corruption, National Economic Government Council, June 2011), p. 58 – 59, 67 – 70, 106
- Vondráček, O., Havrda, M., 21 recipes – Anti-corruption cookbook, Recipe 16: Tools against “tailoring” of public procurement contracts, December 2013
More about methodology
Justification and sources