To enhance the cost-effectiveness of the solution which is to be financed by the public investments, several alternatives of the solutions should be submitted for consideration.*
* For example, is the best possible solution to build a new four-lane highway to downtown or is it better to repair the existing road and build a cycle path next to it?
If there was an obligation during the preparatory phase of public investments to also propose alternative solutions, it would be possible to preclude pushing by force of one-sided projects which often have a significant corruption potential.
Sources:
- Ministry of Regional Development of the Czech Republic: Cost & Benefit Analysis, Methodical Guide, May 2004, p. 14
- Ministry of Regional Development of the Czech Republic: Feasibility study, Methodical Guide, May 2004, str. 10
- Kameník, M., Plhoň, T., Šanc, F.,More than a Public Procurement Act: economy, transparency and accountability in public purchases, Oživení, 2012, p. 23, 41-42 and 59
- Kohout, P. andcoll., Collection of texts of a working group for the fight against corruption, National Economic Government Council, June 2011, p. 50, 54 - 55
- Vondráček, O., Havrda, M., 21 recipes – Anti-corruption cookbook, Recipe 15: Evaluation of investments from the public interest perspective, December 2013
More about methodology
Justification and sources