With respect to the public investment it is necessary take into account not only to the costs of investment but all its costs, that is also costs resulting from the subsequent operation and use of the public works. To evaluate the overall sustainability of the investment it is possible to use the tools commonly used in business practice.
If with respect to public investments not only their actual costs, but also their lifetime costs resulting from their subsequent operation were taken into account, it would be possible the “unexpected” additional costs and works which are often a source of corruption.
Sources:
- Institute for International Relations, Ministry of foreign affairs of the Czech Republic: Project cycle manual for foreign development cooperation of the Czech Republic, 2006, p. 23
- Ministry of Regional Development of the Czech Republic: Cost & Benefit Analysis, Methodical Guide, May 2004, p. 5 - 7
- Kameník, M., Plhoň, T., Šanc, F.,More than a Public Procurement Act: economy, transparency and accountability in public purchases, Oživení, 2012, p. 8, 23, 41-42 and 59
- Kohout, P. andcoll., Collection of texts of a working group for the fight against corruption, National Economic Government Council, June 2011, p. 54 – 55, 60
- Vondráček, O., Havrda, M., 21 recipes – Anti-corruption cookbook, Recipe 15: Evaluation of investments from the public interest perspective, December 2013
More about methodology
Justification and sources