Politician or high public official should be prohibited from doing business in the sector where he worked when was in the public office (the “revolving doors” principle). Politician should have a duty to report if he/she learned that other politician got into the situation of conflict of interest situation or corruption.
If for certain period of time, politicians and high public officials were not allowed to make use of contacts and information they obtained in the public office, the amount of situations of conflict of interest could be reduced as well as undue influencing of public affairs. If, in addition,politicians had a disclosure obligation, as far as corruption of their peers is concerned, it would be possible to disrupt the existing „information corruption solidarity“ among them.
Sources:
- OECD: Revolving Doors, Accountability and Transparency - Emerging Regulatory Concerns and Policy Solutions in the Financial Crisis, Expert Group on Conflict of Interest, Paris, 28 April 2009, p. 68 - 69
- OECD: Guidelines for Managing Conflict of Interest in the Public Service, point 2.3.2. a), p. 12
- REST. Depolitisation of the civil service, Reconstruction of the State [online], 2013, principle 4
- Transparency International: Corruption risks in the Visegrad Countries – Visegrad Integrity System Study, 2012, p. 28
- Transparency International Czech Republic, Conflict of interest – Czech Republic [online], p. 5
- Kraus L., Fadrný, M., Principles of the reform in the area of lobbying regulation, Institute of Sociology of the Academy of Science of the Czech Republic – Environmental Law Service, p. 12
- Information about a further action in the area of lobbying regulation in the Czech Republic and principles for the proposal of an Act on lobbying, p. 12
- Vondráček, O., Havrda, M., 21 recipes – Anti-corruption cookbook, Recipe 1: Reducing corruption opportunities, December 2013
More about methodology
Justification and sources